James Kenton has become a symbol of strength for many people in Tennessee’s criminal justice system. The former roofer, who was charged with false fraud charges and had his property seized due to a violation of his 4th amendment rights, (All of Kenton’s property was eventually returned after a different court battle) has recently “won” his opposition to the state’s motion to dismiss the lawsuit he filed against the State of Tennessee and Prosecutor Chadwick Jackson. The lawsuit was filed to highlight the ongoing corruption in Tennessee’s criminal justice system and the fact that Jackson has violated several ethics rules laid out by the Tennessee Bar Association in Brentwood, TN.

The original charges against Kenton have been dismissed, but he still faces five new “False” felony charges that were filed by ADA Chadwick Jackson from the Davidson County District Attorney’s office. This is the same District Attorney’s Office that is now under criminal investigation for different corrupt activities. The new Flase charges are only in an attempt to thwart his efforts to bring light to the corruption in the criminal justice system. Despite this, the lawsuit has moved forward, and James Kenton’s case against the state has become a growing symbol of much-needed change and reform in the American criminal justice system and in Nashville, Tennessee. Tennessee has been ranked as one of the most corrupt states in the US.

The lawsuit filed by James Kenton has put the spotlight on prosecutor Chadwick Jackson who is accused of going against his own ethics set by the Tennessee Bar in Brentwood and the former Detective William Thorowgood who was decommissioned as a Metro Nashville, police officer back in December of 2022 for assaulting a homeless man. As a result of the case, Chadwick Jackson is now a witness in the false criminal case brought against Mr. James Kenton of Mount Juliet, TN. This is yet, another ethics violation. Jim Kenton adds, “This does not surprise me that Jackson has put himself in this situation considering how this DA’s office is run and knowing what we know now with this criminal investigation going on.”

The fight for greater transparency and accountability in the criminal justice system is just beginning. With his lawsuit and the victory he’s recently achieved, James Kenton has become a champion for many in the criminal justice system. His courage and commitment to speak out against injustice and corruption have been an inspiration to many and no doubt will be remembered in the years to come. By holding those in power accountable and highlighting justice issues, Jim Kenton has also forced many in the news media to stop and take notice as they finally followed up on the case and reported on its progress.

James Kenton’s courage to stand up for what he believed in and take on a state agency has helped bring to light the issues of injustice and corruption in the criminal justice system. His story has been an inspiration to many, and the victory he’s recently achieved, it’s a sure sign that the fight for greater transparency and accountability in the criminal justice system is just beginning.

Read more about Kenton’s case:

#JusticeForJamesKenton #ProtectTNrights #NashvillePDneedsAccountability #JusticeMatters #StandWithKenton #NoPoliceMisconduct #TNDemandJustice #VisitTN #ExploreTN #ExperienceTN #DiscoverTN #TravelTN #TNTravels #TennesseeVacation #TennesseeTourism #VisitTNUSA #TNTourism #VisitingTN #ActNow #WeDemandChange #ThisMustStop #TakeActionNow #MakeAChange #MakeYourVoiceHeard #StandUnited #TogetherWeCan #StandForSomething #OurFutureMatters #ChooseActivism #InjusticeMustEnd #ReleaseTheInnocent #OverturntheConviction #EndPoliceBrutality #FalselyAccused #FalseArrest #FairJusticeForAll #RightingTheWrongs #RightToJustice #EndTheSystemicOppression #viralvideo #viral

Mar 24, 2023

NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE – James P. Kenton of Mount Juliet, Tennessee has recently opened a Merchant Circle account to share his unbiased experience standing up for justice amidst false accusations of Home Improvement Fraud back in 2020. Merchant Circle is a popular website that connects small-business owners to their patrons.

Through this account, Kenton has been able to provide accurate disclosure of the circumstances and bring recognition to the cause of contractor rights. With his conviction in furthering his case with social media, Kenton shared, “I am glad I was able to stand up against this injustice against me and mostly I am grateful for my conviction to get the truth out.” The link for the Merchant Circle listing is: https://www.merchantcircle.com/james-kenton-tennessee-mount-juliet-tn#signing 

Kenton’s case received significant press coverage on Nashville’s NewsChannel 5 WTVF and WSMV Channel 4. However, Kenton’s full story was not accurately reported in the press, resulting in a one-sided account. Kenton’s criminal case against him was dismissed by the State of Tennessee. After the dismissal, Kenton proceeded to sue the State and its prosecutor, Assistant District Attorney Chadwick Jackson, for the many constitutional violations he experienced over the course of his case.

Despite the State’s attempt to dismiss the case, the lawsuit has survived and has now entered the discovery process. In retaliation, Jackson filed five additional sham felony charges against Kenton, garnering the attention of many advocates. For more information visit www.jameskentonvstennessee.com

Contact Information:
James Kenton
jimkenton24@gmail.com

Former detective William Thorowgood of the Metro Nashville, TN Police Department has recently disappeared from his Springfield, TN home, prompting many to wonder why the sudden departure. Months prior, the ex-cop had been decommissioned from the force after footage of him brutally assaulting a homeless man in front of his wife and daughter had gone public. Reports now show Thorowgood to have taken up temporary residence in the small town of White Plains, Kentucky. According to USA People Search, https://www.usa-people-search.com/address/po-box-5_white-plains-ky-42464 the town is home to less than one thousand residents, but maybe just the place Thorowgood needs to hide from the public shame and controversy brought upon himself.

This isn’t the first time the now-ex-cop has been in hot water, as accusations of gross misconduct on the part of the detective had arisen in 2020 while working on the case of contractor James Kenton of Mount Juliet, TN. Kenton filed a lawsuit against both Thorowgood and the state of Tennessee for a constitutional violation, which may have been reason enough for the ex-detective to flee the area. What Thorowgood’s motivations truly are and what will become of him remain unknown, as the ex-cop now resides in relative anonymity in his new home of White Plains, KY.

https://twitter.com/JimKenton9

Nashville, Tennessee is a vibrant and fast-growing city with a great legal system and track record in regard to the pursuit of justice. Unfortunately, the criminal justice system is not perfect and there have been instances of prosecutorial misconduct in the past. In this article, we will take a look at the difference between malicious prosecution and vindictive prosecution, and how they differ from prosecutorial misconduct.

Malicious Prosecution is defined as the abuse of legal process by initiating, or causing to be initiated, criminal proceedings against another without reasonable or probable cause. The intent behind malicious prosecution is to inflict injury and damage on the defendant, usually in the form of lost freedom, money, or resources. These proceedings can be initiated through false accusations or through malicious withholding of information from the court.

Vindictive Prosecution takes place when a prosecutor maliciously and selectively enforces the laws against a particular defendant for a bad and personal reason. This type of prosecution is motivated by a desire to punish the defendants themselves, as opposed to protecting society by seeking a conviction of the defendant for the crime they are accused of committing. For example, this could occur when a prosecutor seeks a harsher sentence then what the law prescribes, or when they unnecessarily add additional charges in order to increase the penalties that the defendant must face.

Though both malicious prosecution and vindictive prosecution share many of the same characteristics, they are fundamentally different from prosecutorial misconduct. Prosecutorial Misconduct is a broad umbrella term that encompasses a wide range of behaviors displayed by a prosecutor that go beyond a simple and good-faith interpretation of the law. Examples of prosecutorial misconduct include purposefully introducing false evidence, intimidating witnesses, and failing to turn over exculpatory evidence to defense counsel.

Prosecutorial misconduct is an egregious violation of justice that should not be allowed in any criminal system, but it can often be difficult to identify and prove. In Nashville, Tennessee, any case affected by malicious prosecution or vindictive prosecution will be addressed and reviewed to ensure that the legal process is not abused.

In conclusion, malicious prosecution and vindictive prosecution are two distinct, but related concepts that should not be confused with prosecutorial misconduct. It is important for anyone who is facing criminal charges to understand the difference between these three types of legal proceedings and to be aware of the protections that the citizens of Nashville, Tennessee are afforded by their criminal justice system.

https://www.yelp.com/biz/james-kenton-tennessee-roofing-mt-juliet

https://twitter.com/JimKenton9

A stormy media spectacle that has captivated Tennessee for the past six months has recently taken a sharp turn as James Kenton, a Mt. Juliet-based roofing contractor, pinned an accusation of malicious defamation on Detective William Decker Thorowgood. While the two were entangled in a court battle, Thorowgood allegedly made several false and damaging statements about Kenton on two local news channels.

The case started in May when a former client of Kenton accused the contractor of fraud and instigated the charges. To Kenton’s dismay, Detective Thorowgood was the lead detective on Kenton’s case and had frequently made false statements regarding Kenton, which Thorowgood later clarified on camera were based on nothing more than mere suspicion. While the court eventually ruled in Kenton’s favor, the financial losses and damage to his reputation were tremendous.

Kenton claimed the Thorowgood’s statements fall within the realm of defamatory under Tennessee law which states that any false statement directed at the plaintiff, harmful to the plaintiff, and made without care or out of actual malice constitutes libel. The contractor further claimed the detective made these statements in collaboration with a local news reporter, Jennifer Kraus, damaging beyond repair Kenton’s future prospects and legal credibility.

To make matters worse, Thorowgood was recently captured on camera assaulting a man for alleged littering. Thorowgood claimed that the man had dropped a bag of candy on the way back from a Walmart, though the victim maintains his innocence in the case.

In a desperate attempt to make sense of the circumstances and mitigate the damage caused to his reputation, Kenton has since filed a petition to raise awareness of the rampant police corruption amongst Tennessee law enforcement. “Since I started speaking out about how Thorowgood violated my rights and ruined my good standing, I have only been hit with more of the same fake felony charges,” Kenton said. “The petition is to gather more support and start a movement to bring these bad apples to justice. It’s to make an example of corrupt officers so that what happened to me doesn’t have to happen to anyone else. Signing it would help my case and prevent Thorowgood from victimizing more innocent lives. ”

Kenton’s ordeal highlights the increasingly rampant police corruption in Tennessee and the limited measures to address the issue. The contractor’s legal team believes that the arrest warrant used in Kenton’s case, which was alleged to contain nine incidents of perjury, lacked a valid basis and is a prime example of the injustice prevalent in Tennessee.

Though Kenton has since been exonerated from all his charges, the damage to his reputation and financial losses due to Thorowgood’s false accusations remain considerable. The contractor has since launched a campaign to shed light on Thorowgood’s misconduct, urging the court to pronounce due punishments for the misuse and abuse of power.

From the press release of Kenton’s case, the contractor and his legal team present solid evidence to back the accusations of malicious defamation against Detective Thorowgood. Kenton and his supporters continue to rally for a just verdict as the contractor resolves to highlight the rampant corruption and injustice in Tennessee’s police force. The public has responded positively to Kenton’s campaign, as it forms a unique platform to bring attention to a grossly overlooked issue. As of writing, Kenton’s petition has gathered over seven hundred signatures from across the country and from various social media channels. For more information and to lend your support to Kenton’s cause, please visit https://jameskentonvstennessee. com/

ADA Chadwick Jackson’s Ethics in the Wider Context of the State

9 March 2023|Lawsuit against Tennessee

James Kenton filed the civil lawsuit against the state long before Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti started investigating the Nashville DA’s office. The latter didn’t happen until February 2023, whereas Kenton’s case dates back to late 2022. 

While the two matters are unrelated, they lend credence to Kenton’s allegations against Assistant District Attorney Chadwick Jackson, who works under the same Nashville DA. 

A Wiretapping Investigation is Underway at the DA’s Office

On 21st February, The Tennessean broke the news that the Davidson County DA’s office was under investigation for unauthorized wiretapping, a criminal offense. The Nashville DA Glenn Funk’s office was also asked to preserve any records related to buying, installing, using, and maintaining the recording equipment. 

However, Funk’s side has responded by denying these allegations by saying they know their laws, something Kenton disagrees with (more on that later).

Funk on the Alleged Recording Devices

While the state continues to investigate, the Nashville DA is quick to deny any wrongdoing, saying they haven’t installed recording devices but something similar to ring cameras at the front doors of their offices to surveil anyone entering or exiting their premises.  

The reason for taking these measures was the death threats made by an individual, which led to a 10-hour standoff at one of their offices that ended after the perpetrator set an apartment complex on fire and fired several shots at law enforcement. 

DA Funk also said that the “ring cameras” were installed after the discovery of weapons on several visitors. They haven’t recorded anything that might violate privacy laws and were solely installed to protect the 160 members of his office. 

One of the 160: ADA Chadwick Jackson 

Prosecutor Chadwick Jackson is one of the 160 members that DA Funk has claimed to protect after being accused of illegal wiretapping, but roofer James Kenton doesn’t think he’s threatened; far from it. If anything, he’s threatening the very people whose rights he’s sworn to protect. 

One of those people was James Kenton, a Tennessee-based roofer who ended up losing his source of income due to the callous actions of Prosecutor Jackson and Detective William Decker Thorogood, an out-of-control police officer who was recently caught on camera assaulting a man in front of his child. 

What Happened After James Kenton vs. The State of Tennessee?

After Kenton filed the lawsuit against the state, explicitly accusing Jackson and Thorogood of 10 charges, the former filed additional felony charges against Kenton in retaliation. Jackson’s ethical violation of being a witness in the case he’s advocating reflects poorly on the Nashville DA and doesn’t help their case now that they’re under investigation for wiretapping. 

As for James Kenton, his civil lawsuit is in the discovery phase of the pretrial proceedings and should begin any day now. 

Contact him or stay tuned for more updates on this ongoing trial.  

James Kenton of Mount Juliet, TN

The answer to the question; is it actionable? YES!

Civil conspiracy is defined as two or more persons combining or agreeing with each other to commit an unlawful act or to commit a lawful act by unlawful means. In North Carolina, as outlined in General Statutes 1-75 of the North Carolina State Law, individuals engaging in a civil conspiracy may be held liable for the torts of other conspirators, and can also be held liable for the consequences of the actions of the conspirator.

The penalty for civil conspiracy in the state of North Carolina is the same as the penalty for the actual offense, meaning that the persons involved in civil conspiracy can be held liable for the acts of each other, as well as the consequences of all of those acts.

Examples of civil conspiracy in North Carolina include individuals planning and executing a criminal act such as fraud, robbery, or murder. Additionally, a group of individuals engaging in “gang-like” behavior, such as drug activity or prostitution, have also been found guilty of civil conspiracy. Finally, a group of individuals agreeing to commit a civil wrong, such as boycotting a business, may be held liable for civil conspiracy.

To quote the North Carolina General Statutes 1-75: “If two or more persons combine or agree with each other to commit a crime or to commit a lawful act by unlawful means, each of them shall be liable for the torts of the other committed in pursuance of the conspiracy, and may be held liable for the consequences of the actions of the other conspiring persons. ”

James Kenton is a roofing contractor who was falsely accused of a crime and now believes a “Tribe” of people was involved in influencing a now-decommissioned police detective into charging Mr. Kenton. James Kenton has filed a lawsuit against the State of Tennessee and the Prosecutor Chadwick Jackson of the Davidson County DA’s office.

Back in February 2023, the Davidson County DA’s office was notified by The Tennessee State’s Attorney General, that their office was under criminal investigation.

James Kenton will fight back with civil lawsuits to hold anyone accountable for actions outlined in this article.

Abuse of Process in Massachusetts

Abuse of process is a complex civil claim that is usually used when a defendant’s actions exceed the scope of the legal process, either due to its vehement nature or malicious intent. In North Carolina, it is codified within N. C. Gen. Stat. § 1–539. 3, which defines civil action within the state. Abuse of process is generally considered an intentional tort, meaning its intent is to cause financial or mental damages to the plaintiff.

When a defendant engages in an abuse of process, the resulting conduct is considered a gross deviation of intent or purpose that can cause harm to the plaintiff. An example of abuse of process is when a defendant files an affidavit in court knowing it is false and its only purpose is to bring harm to the plaintiff. This action constitutes an intentional misuse of the judicial system and may entitle the plaintiff to legal action.

In North Carolina, a plaintiff must prove four different elements before a court will determine it as an abuse of process. The defendant must be shown to have:

(1) Used a process issued by the court in some manner;

(2) Used it for an unusually oppressive purpose, or in a manner that was not authorized by the process;

(3) Acted with an ulterior motive and purpose, not within the scope of the process; and

(4) Produced actual legal injury to the plaintiff.

The legal injury must also be a direct result of the defendant’s conduct, such as financial and/or mental damages. Such damages may include out-of-pocket expenses involving court costs and attorney’s fees, and/or reputational injuries suffered by the plaintiff. If the plaintiff successfully establishes all four elements and the cause of action of abuse of process, the defendant will be found liable in civil court and They may be ordered to pay both compensatory and punitive damages.

Thus, abuse of process is a serious legal issue in North Carolina, and it is important to understand when it applies and what legal action can be taken. Abusing the judicial process can often have dire consequences for those involved, and it is important for individuals to be aware of their rights in what can seem like an often unfair legal system.

Examples of Abuse of Process:

Filing a knowingly false affidavit with the intent to bring harm to the plaintiff’s character constitutes an abuse of process.

www.jameskentonvstennessee.com

The answer is YES!

The “long arm” statute in North Carolina allows courts to exercise personal jurisdiction over non-resident defendants who have purposefully availed themselves of the privileges of conducting activities in the state, have caused injuries in certain ways, or whose activities within the state have some substantial connection with an alleged cause of action. For a court to exercise this kind of jurisdiction, the court is looking to see if sufficient contacts between the non-resident defendant and North Carolina have been established.

In the case of a plaintiff trying to bring a defendant from Portland, Maine to North Carolina to answer to a formal complaint, the plaintiff must provide evidence that one of the three criteria has been met. There needs to be proof that the defendant made some effort to conducting activities in North Carolina with the intent of deriving benefit or advantage, or that the defendant is guilty of negligence or other wrongful conduct that has caused some harm. The defendant also needs to have some contact with North Carolina which can be used to link the cause of action to the state.

In showing that these criteria have been met, the plaintiff must provide evidence of the non-resident defendant’s contacts with North Carolina or the activities that occurred within the state. For instance, if the defendant is trying to bring a business dispute to the court, proof of communications and business activity is required. In the case of a personal injury, evidence of the defendant’s negligence and the injuries caused must be provided. In short, any contacts between the defendant and North Carolina must be established by credible evidence in order for the court to exercise jurisdiction.

The “long arm” statute in North Carolina is a powerful tool for both plaintiffs and defendants. For plaintiffs, it enables them to bring a lawsuit against a non-resident defendant from a completely different state.

In order to use the “long arm” statute in North Carolina, it’s important for both plaintiffs and defendants to understand the legal requirements and be prepared to provide evidence to back up their claims. From a plaintiff’s perspective, it’s important to be able to prove the contacts the non-resident defendant has had with the state and how they are connected to the cause of action. From a defendant’s perspective, they want to be able to show that their contacts with North Carolina were not sufficient enough to be held liable in the state. Ultimately, it all comes down to understanding the legal requirements and making sure the evidence submitted to the court is sufficient enough to make a good case for or against the exercise of personal jurisdiction.

Examples:

The defendant has availed themselves of North Carolina’s Sheriff’s Office to effect service of documents, engaged in prior litigious proceedings, and journeyed to the state, among other actions.

www.jameskentonvstennessee.com