InfluenceMap maintains the world’s leading database assessing corporate climate policy engagement (LobbyMap), covering over 500 companies and 250 industry associations globally. This database feeds data and analysis to the Climate Action 100+ (CA100+) initiative.
CA100+ is a voluntary investor initiative to ensure the world's largest corporate greenhouse gas emitters take necessary action on climate change, made up of 700 investors responsible for over $68 trillion in assets under management. CA100+ engagement focuses on 171 target companies that are critical to the net-zero emissions transition.
The CA100+ Investor Hub contains LobbyMap’s analysis of the CA100+ target companies and their industry associations, as well as additional resources on corporate climate policy engagement disclosures and shareholder resolutions. From 2022, InfluenceMap's assessments on climate policy engagement also feed directly into the CA100+ Net Zero Company Benchmark.
An overview of the LobbyMap scoring system can be found here, with the full methodology here.
InfluenceMap welcomes engagement with CA100+ investors, companies, and industry associations on the issue of climate policy engagement.
If you have any questions, or would like to set up a call to discuss our analysis in more detail, please contact engagements@influencemap.org.
The table below contains a ranking of the CA100+ target companies. The companies are ranked according to their InfluenceMap grade, with those at the top having the highest grades (signifying support for Paris-aligned climate policy), and those toward the bottom having the lowest grades (signifying opposition to Paris-aligned climate policy). Companies labelled 'n/a' are not given a grade because they have low-level engagement with climate policy and/or no strong links to industry associations currently covered by InfluenceMap's database.
Use the drop-down buttons to filter companies by sector or region, or search by name below. A summary profile and full access to the data underlying the assessments can be accessed via the links in the table.
This symbol 
indicates a company has published a review of its climate policy engagement. InfluenceMap's assessment of this review can be accessed by clicking on the icon. More information can be found on the Disclosure Assessments page.
| Influencemap Performance Band | Organization | Engagement Intensity | Published Review? |
|---|
InfluenceMap updates its assessment of companies and industry associations on a weekly basis. Our Weekly LobbyMap Updates capture how these organizations are attempting to influence live climate-related policy debates in real-time.
The full list of lobbying updates can be accessed here, or by clicking on 'See All Updates' below. Please contact engagements@influencemap.org to sign up to receive these weekly alerts directly via e-mail.
In a statement released on April 25th, the American Petroleum Institute (API) did not support the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)'s finalized emissions standards for existing coal and new gas plants, claiming that the rules would affect grid reliability.
In an April 25th press release, Advanced Energy United President and CEO Heather O'Neill stated support for the finalized federal standards addressing GHG emissions from existing coal and new gas plants. O’Neill emphasized that utilities “need to do right by ratepayers” and transition rapidly away from fossil fuels, rather than building new gas plants or prolonging existing coal plants.
In an April 25th press release, Edison Electric Institute CEO Dan Brouillette expressed disappointment with the finalized federal standards addressing GHG emissions from existing coal and new gas plants. Brouillette specifically criticized the carbon capture and storage (CCS) compliance pathway, emphasizing that CCS technology was not ready for the rules’ compliance timelines which begin in the 2030s. At the same time, he stated appreciation for the flexibility built into the rules, saying that they would help EEI members meet “reliability concerns in the years ahead.” The statement follows EEI’s repeated opposition to the ambition of these rules over the past year, which many member utilities echoed in their own engagements with the rules.
