Vlad C. Coroamă
ABSTRACT
Information and communication technologies (ICT) are increasingly seen as key enablers for climate change mitigation measures. They can make existing products and activities more efficient or substitute them altogether. Consequently, different initiatives have started to estimate the environmental effects of ICT services. Such assessments, however, lack scientific rigor and often rely on crude assumptions and methods, leading to inaccurate or even misleading results. The few methodological attempts that exist do not address several crucial aspects, and are thus insufficient to foster good assessment practice. Starting from such a high-level standard from the European Telecommunication Standardisation Institute (ETSI) and the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), this article identifies the shortcomings of existing methodologies and proposes solutions. It addresses several aspects for the assessment of single ICT services: the goal and scope definition (analyzing differences between ICT substitution and optimization, the time perspective of the assessment, the challenge of a hypothetical baseline for the situation without the ICT solution, and the differences between modelling and case studies) as well as the often-ignored influence of rebound effects and the difficult extrapolation from case studies to larger populations.
- Johan Rockström, Owen Gaffney, Joeri Rogelj, Malte Meinshausen, Nebusja Nakicenovic, and Hans Joachim Schellnhuber. 2017. A roadmap for rapid decarbonization. Science, vol. 355, no. 6331, pp. 1269--1271. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah3443Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Roland Hischier and Lorenz M. Hilty. Environmental Impacts of an International Conference, 2002. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, vol. 22, pp. 543--557. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(02)00027-6Google ScholarCross Ref
- Vlad C. Coroamă, Lorenz M. Hilty, and Martin Birtel. 2012. Effects of Internet-Based Multiple-Site Conferences on Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Telematics & Informatics, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 362--374. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2011.11.006Google Scholar
- Jens Malmodin, Pernilla Bergmark, Nina Lövehagen, Mine Ercan, and Anna Bondesson. 2014. Considerations for macro-level studies of ICT's enabling potential. In proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on ICT for Sustainability (ICT4S 2014), August 24-27, 2014, Stockholm, Sweden. Atlantis Press. DOI:https://dx.doi.org/10.2991/ict4s-14.2014.22Google Scholar
- Adrien Beton, Cécile Des Abbayes, Sanáee Iyama, Lutz Stobbe, Sebastian Gallehr, and Lutz Günter Scheidt. 2008. Impacts of Information and Communication Technologies on Energy Efficiency. BioIntelligence Service for European Commission DG INFSO. Retrieved from ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/fp7/ict/docs/sustainable-growth/ict4ee-final-report_en.pdf.Google Scholar
- GESI. 2008. SMART 2020: Enabling the Low Carbon Economy in the Information Age. Available: www.theclimategroup.org/what-we-do/publications/smart2020-enabling-the-low-carbon-economy-in-the-information-age/Google Scholar
- GESI. 2012. SMARTer2020: The Role of ICT in Driving a Sustainable Future. Retrieved from http://gesi.org/SMARTer2020Google Scholar
- GESI and Accenture Strategy, 2015. #SMARTer2030 -- ICT Solutions for 21st Century Challenges. Retrieved from http://smarter2030.gesi.org/Google Scholar
- British Telecom. 2014. Net Good. Retrieved from http://www.btplc.com/betterfuture/betterfuturereport/section/summaries/Net%20Good.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Telstra. 2014. Connecting with a Low-Carbon Future.Google Scholar
- AT&T. 2017. Measuring the Carbon Abatement Potential of AT&T's Products and Services -- Methodology to Track Progress Toward AT&T's 10X Goal. Retrieved from https://about. att.com/content/dam/csr/otherpdfs/ATT-10x-Methodology-2017.pdfGoogle Scholar
- European Commission. 2008. Addressing the Challenge of Energy Efficiency through Information and Communication Technologies. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/information_society/activities/sustainable_growth/docs/com2008_241_all_lang/com_2008_241_1_en.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2009. Measuring the Relationship between ICT and the Environment. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/sti/43539507.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Dennis Pamlin. 2002. Sustainability at the Speed of Light. WWF, Sweden. Retrieved from http://assets.panda.org/downloads/wwf_ic_1.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Dennis Pamlin and Katalin Szomolányi. 2006. Saving the Climate @ the Speed of Light. WWF Sweden 2006, Retrieved from http://assets.panda.org/downloads/road_map_speed_of_light_wwf_etno.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Dennis Pamlin and Suzanne Pahlman. 2008. Outline for the first global IT strategy for CO2 reductions. Retrieved from http://assets.panda.org/downloads/global_strategy_for_the_1st_billion tonnes_with_ict_by_wwf.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Pernilla Bergmark, Vlad C. Coroamă, Mattias Höjer, and Craig Donovan. A Methodology for Assessing the Environmental Effects Induced by ICT Services, Part II: Multiple Services and Companies. In Proceedings of 7th International Conference on ICT for Sustainability (ICT4S 2020), Bristol, UK, 2020. ACM.Google ScholarDigital Library
- ISO. 2006. Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Principles and framework. ISO 14040:2006.Google Scholar
- Vlad C. Coroamă and Lorenz M. Hilty. Assessing Internet energy intensity: A review of methods and results. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, vol. 45, pp. 63--68, 2// 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2013.12.004Google Scholar
- Jens Malmodin, Dag Lundén, Åsa Moberg, Greger Andersson, and Mikael Nilsson. 2014. Life Cycle Assesment of ICT - Carbon Footprint and Operational Electricity use from the Operator, National, and Subscriber Perspective in Sweden. Journal of Industrial Ecology, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 829--845, 2014. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12145Google ScholarCross Ref
- Eric Williams. 2011. Environmental effects of information and communications technologies. Nature, vol. 479, no. 7373, pp. 354--358. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10682Google ScholarCross Ref
- Miriam Börjesson Rivera, Cecilia Håkansson, Åsa Svenfelt, and Göran Finnveden. 2014. Including second order effects in environmental assessments of ICT. Environmental Modelling & Software, vol. 56, pp. 105--115. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.02.005Google ScholarCross Ref
- European Telecommunication Standards Institute Environmental Engineering (ETSI EE). 2015. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of ICT equipment, networks and services; General methodology and common requirements. ETSI ES 203 199 (02/2015): Version 1.3.1.Google Scholar
- International Telecommunication Union Standardization Sector (ITU-T). 2014. Methodology for environmental life cycle assessments of information and communication technology goods, networks and services. ITU-T L.1410.Google Scholar
- Lorenz M. Hilty and Bernard Aebischer. 2014. ICT for Sustainability: An Emerging Research Field. In ICT Innovations for Sustainability, L. M. Hilty and B. Aebischer, Eds.: Springer International Publishing, 2014, pp. 1--34.Google Scholar
- GESI. 2010. Evaluating the carbon reducing impacts of ICT: An assessment methodology. Retrieved from http://gesi.org/files/Reports/Evaluating%20the%20carbon-reducing%20impacts%20of%20ICT September2010.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Andie Stephens and Veronica Thieme. 2018. Framework for Assessing Avoided Emissions. Accelerating innovation and disruptive low- and zero-carbon solutions. Part 2: Draft methodology for calculating avoided emissions. Mission Innovation Solution Framework, Retrieved from https://www.misolutionframework.net/downloads/MI Solutions Framework pt2_Draft_methodology_for_calculating_avoided_emissions_v2018-1.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Mattias Höjer, Åsa Moberg, and Greger Henriksson. 2015. Digitalisering och hållbar konsumtion. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Stockholm, Sweden. Retrieved from https://www.naturvardsverket.se/Nerladdningssida/?fileType=pdf&downloadUrl=/Documents/publikationer6400/978-91-620-6675-8.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Vlad C. Coroamă and Lorenz M. Hilty. Energy Consumed vs. Energy Saved by ICT -- A Closer Look. 2009. In EnviroInfo 2009: Environmental Informatics and Industrial Environmental Protection: Concepts, Methods and Tools, 23rd International Conference on Informatics for Environmental Protection, Berlin, Germany, 2009, pp. 353--361: Shaker Verlag. ISBN: 978-3-8322-8397-1Google Scholar
- Lorenz. M. Hilty and Bernd Page. 2015. Information technology and renewable energy --- Modelling, simulation, decision support and environmental assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, vol. 52, p. 1. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2014.10.005Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lorenz Erdmann and Lorenz M. Hilty. 2010. Scenario Analysis: Exploring the Macroeconomic Impacts of Information and Communication Technologies on Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Journal of Industrial Ecology, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 826--843, 2010. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2010.00277.xGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- Kirsten Halsnæs, John M. Callaway and Henrik Jacob Meyer. 1998. Economics of Greenhouse Gas Limitations. Main Reports. Methodological Guidelines. Risø National Laboratory. UNEP Collaborating Centre on Energy and Environment.Google Scholar
- Clara Borggren, Åsa Moberg, Minna Räsänenb, and Göran Finnveden. 2013. Business meetings at a distance -- decreasing greenhouse gas emissions and cumulative energy demand? Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 41, pp. 126--139. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.09.003Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jayant A. Sathaye and N. H. Ravindranath. 1998. Climate Change Mitigation in the Energy and Forestry Sectors of Developing Countries. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 387--437. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.23.1.387Google ScholarCross Ref
- Volker Krey et al. 2014. Annex II: Metrics & Methodology. In Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, O. Edenhofer et al., Eds. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
- Jan Bieser and Lorenz M. Hilty. 2018. Assessing Indirect Environmental Effects of Information and Communication Technology (ICT): A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability, vol. 10, no. 8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082662Google Scholar
- David L. Sackett. 1979. Bias in analytic research. Journal of Chronic Diseases, vol. 32, no. 1-2, pp. 51--63, 1979. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(79)90012-2Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jens Malmodin and Vlad C. Coroamă. 2016. Assessing ICT's enabling effect through case study extrapolation -- the example of smart metering. In The proceedings of 2016 Electronics Goes Green 2016+ (EGG 2016), Berlin, Germany, 2016. IEEE. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/EGG.2016.7829814Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Daniel Khazzoom, 1980. Economic Implications of Mandated Efficiency in Standards for Household Appliances. The Energy Journal, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 21--40, 1980. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol1-No4-2Google Scholar
- Peter H. G. Berkhout, Jos C. Muskens, and Jan W. Velthuijsen. 2000. Defining the rebound effect. Energy Policy, vol. 28, no. 6-7, pp. 425--432, 2000. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00022-7Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mahtias Binswanger. 2001. Technological progress and sustainable development: what about the rebound effect? Ecological Economics, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 119--132. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00214-7Google ScholarCross Ref
- Steve Sorrell. 2009. Jevons' Paradox revisited: The evidence for backfire from improved energy efficiency. Energy Policy, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 1456--1469. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.003Google ScholarCross Ref
- Vlad C. Coroamă and Friedemann Mattern. 2019. Digital Rebound -- Why Digitalization Will Not Redeem Us Our Environmental Sins. In Proceedings of 6th International Conference on ICT for Sustainability (ICT4S 2019). June 10-14 2019, Lappeenranta, Finland. CEUR Vol-2382 urn:nbn:de:0074-2382-7. Retrieved from: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2382/Google Scholar
- Lorenz M. Hilty, Bernard Aebischer, and Andrea-Emilio Rizzoli. Modeling and evaluating the sustainability of smart solutions. Environmental Modelling & Software, vol. 56, pp. 1--5, 2014. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.04.001Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tomomi Nagao, Yuichiro Takei, and Shinsuke Hannoe. 2015. Evaluation Methods of the 'By ICT ' Effect. NTT. Retrieved from https://www.ntt-review.jp/anqtest/archive/ntttechnical.php?contents=ntr201503fa2_s.html.Google Scholar
- Frank W. Geels. 2002. Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, vol. 31, no. 8-9, pp. 1257--1274, 12// 2002. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- A Methodology for Assessing the Environmental Effects Induced by ICT Services: Part I: Single Services
Recommendations
A Methodology for Assessing the Environmental Effects Induced by ICT Services: Part II: Multiple Services and Companies
ICT4S2020: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on ICT for SustainabilityInformation and communication technologies (ICT) can make existing products and activities more efficient or substitute them altogether and could thus become crucial for the mitigation of climate change. In this context, individual ICT companies, ...
Digital Policy Framework: Agenda for Change 2017
ICTD '17: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and DevelopmentThis note is a concise representation of a comprehensive Digital Policy Framework -- Agenda for Change 2017 report draft, which is yet to be published. The proposed framework is aimed at assisting the digitalization journey of Pakistan. It emphasizes ...
Supporting entrepreneurship with digital services in emerging economies
AfriCHI '18: Proceedings of the Second African Conference for Human Computer Interaction: Thriving CommunitiesThis research project focuses on the ways the micro-entrepreneurs in the emerging economies can utilise the digital services in sustaining their livelihood. The project has instruments to bring digital services to new users via transportable solar power ...
Comments