skip to main content
10.1145/3401335.3401711acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesict4sConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

A Methodology for Assessing the Environmental Effects Induced by ICT Services: Part II: Multiple Services and Companies

Authors Info & Claims
Published:31 July 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Information and communication technologies (ICT) can make existing products and activities more efficient or substitute them altogether and could thus become crucial for the mitigation of climate change. In this context, individual ICT companies, industry organizations and international initiatives have started to estimate the environmental effects of ICT services. Often such assessments rely on crude assumptions and methods, yielding inaccurate or even misleading results. The few existing methodological attempts are too general to provide guidance to practitioners. The starting points of this paper are i) a high-level standard from the European Telecommunication Standardisation Institute (ETSI) and the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), and ii) its suggested enhancements for single service assessment outlined in A Methodology for Assessing the Environmental Effects Induced by ICT Services Part I: Single services (Part I in short). Building on the assessment of single services, the current article identifies and addresses shortcomings of existing methodologies and industry practices with regard to multiple services assessment. For a collection of services, it addresses the goal and scope definition, the so-far ignored aggregation of effects among several services, and the allocation between several companies contributing to one or more services. The article finally brings these considerations together with those of Part I into a workflow for performing such assessments in practice.

References

  1. Vlad C. Coroamă, Pernilla Bergmark, Mattias Höjer, and Jens Malmodin. 2020. A Methodology for Assessing the Environmental Effects Induced by ICT Services, Part I: Single Services. In the proceedings of 7th International Conference on ICT for Sustainability (ICT4S 2020), Bristol, UK, 2020. ACM.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Johan Rockström, Owen Gaffney, Joeri Rogelj, Malte Meinshausen, Nebusja Nakicenovic, and Hans Joachim Schellnhuber. 2017. A roadmap for rapid decarbonization. Science, vol. 355, no. 6331, pp. 1269--1271. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah3443Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Roland Hischier and Lorenz M. Hilty. Environmental Impacts of an International Conference, 2002. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, vol. 22, pp. 543--557. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(02)00027-6Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Vlad C. Coroamă, Lorenz M. Hilty, and Martin Birtel. 2012. Effects of Internet-Based Multiple-Site Conferences on Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Telematics & Informatics, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 362--374.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Jens Malmodin, Pernilla Bergmark, Nina Lövehagen, Mine Ercan, and Anna Bondesson. 2014. Considerations for macro-level studies of ICT's enabling potential. In proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on ICT for Sustainability (ICT4S 2014), August 24-27, 2014, Stockholm, Sweden. Atlantis Press. DOI:https://dx.doi.org/10.2991/ict4s-14.2014.22Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. GESI. 2008. SMART 2020: Enabling the Low Carbon Economy in the Information Age. Available: www.theclimategroup.org/what-we-do/publications/smart2020-enabling-the-low-carbon-economy-in-the-information-age/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. GESI. 2012. SMARTer2020: The Role of ICT in Driving a Sustainable Future. Retrieved from http://gesi.org/SMARTer2020Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. GESI and Accenture Strategy, 2015. #SMARTer2030 -- ICT Solutions for 21st Century Challenges. Retrieved from http://smarter2030.gesi.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. European Commission. 2008. Addressing the Challenge of Energy Efficiency through Information and Communication Technologies. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/information_society/activities/sustainable_growth/docs/com2008_241_all_lang/com 2008 241_1_en.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Adrien Beton, Cécile Des Abbayes, Sanáee Iyama, Lutz Stobbe, Sebastian Gallehr, and Lutz Günter Scheidt. 2008. Impacts of Information and Communication Technologies on Energy Efficiency. Bio Intelligence Service for European Commission DG INFSO. Retrieved from ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/fp7/ict/docs/sustainable-growth/ict4ee-final-report_en.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2009. Measuring the Relationship between ICT and the Environment. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/sti/43539507.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Dennis Pamlin. 2002. Sustainability at the Speed of Light. WWF, Sweden. Retrieved from http://assets.panda.org/downloads/wwf_ic_1.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Dennis Pamlin and Katalin Szomolányi. 2006. Saving the Climate @ the Speed of Light. WWF Sweden 2006, Retrieved from http://assets.panda.org/downloads/road_map_speed_of_light_wwf_etno.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Dennis Pamlin and Suzanne Pahlman. 2008. Outline for the first global IT strategy for CO2 reductions. Retrieved from http://assets.panda.org/downloads/global_strategy_for_the_1st__billion_tonnes_with_ict__by_wwf.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. British Telecom. 2014. Net Good. Retrieved from http://www.btplc.com/betterfuture/betterfuturereport/section/summaries/Net%20Good.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Telstra. 2014. Connecting with a Low-Carbon Future.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. AT&T. 2017. Measuring the Carbon Abatement Potential of AT&T's Products and Services -- Methodology to Track Progress Toward AT&T's 10X Goal. Retrieved from https://about.att.com/content/dam/csr/otherpdfs/ATT-10x-Methodology-2017.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Andie Stephens and Veronica Thieme. 2018. Framework for Assessing Avoided Emissions. Accelerating innovation and disruptive low- and zero-carbon solutions. Part 2: Draft methodology for calculating avoided emissions. Mission Innovation Solution Framework, Retrieved from https://www.misolutionframework.net/downloads/MI_Solutions_Framework_pt2_Draft_methodology_for_calculating_avoided_emissions_v2018-1.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. European Telecommunication Standards Institute Environmental Engineering (ETSI EE). 2015. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of ICT equipment, networks and services; General methodology and common requirements. ETSI ES 203 199 (02/2015): Version 1.3.1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. International Telecommunication Union Standardization Sector (ITU-T). 2014. Methodology for environmental life cycle assessments of information and communication technology goods, networks and services. ITU-T L.1410.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Eric Williams. 2011. Environmental effects of information and communications technologies. Nature, vol. 479, no. 7373, pp. 354--358. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10682Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. International Telecommunication Union Standardization Sector (ITU-T). 2012. Methodology for energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions impact assessment of information and communication technologies in organizations. ITU-T L.1420.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. International Organisation for Standardization (ISO). 2006. Greenhouse gases -- Part 1: Specification with guidance at the organization level for quantification and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions and removals. ISO 14064-1:2006Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. GHG Protocol. 2011. Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Accounting and Reporting Standard. Supplement to the GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. International Telecommunication Union Standardization Sector (ITU-T). 2015. Methodology for environmental impact assessment of information and communication technologies at city level. ITU-T L.1440.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. The Economist. 2010. Out of thin air. The behind-the-scenes logistics of Kenya's mobile-money miracle. The Economist. Available: http://www.economist.com/node/16319635Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Jan Bieser and Lorenz M. Hilty. 2018. Assessing Indirect Environmental Effects of Information and Communication Technology (ICT): A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability, vol. 10, no. 8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082662Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. International Telecommunication Union (ITU). 2013. The case of Korea: the quantification of GHG reduction effects achieved by ICTs. International Telecommunication Union. Retrieved from http://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-t/oth/0b/11/T0B110000243301PDFE.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Robert. M. Solow. 1957. Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function. The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 312--320, 1957.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. R. J. Barro, "Economic Growth in a Cross Section of Countries," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 106, no. 2, pp. 407--443, 1991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1926047Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. United Nations. 2015. Sustainable Development Goals. Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/topicsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Earth Institute. 2015. ICT and SDGs. How Information and Communications Technology can Achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. Retrieved from http://www.ericsson.com/res/docs/2015/ict-and-sdg-interim-report.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A Methodology for Assessing the Environmental Effects Induced by ICT Services: Part II: Multiple Services and Companies

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader